Pecheles Automotive Compares 2018 Audi Q7 VS 2018 Land Rover Range Near New Bern, NC

Responsive image

2018 Audi Q7

Responsive image

2018 Audi Q7

Responsive image

2018 Land Rover Range

Safety Comparison

The Q7 has a standard Secondary Collision Brake Assist, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.

Over 200 people are killed each year when backed over by motor vehicles. The Q7 offers an optional backup collision prevention system which use rear sensors to monitor and automatically apply the brakes to prevent a rear collision. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer backup collision prevention brakes.

A passive infrared night vision system optional on the Q7 Prestige helps the driver to more easily detect people, animals or other objects in front of the vehicle at night. Using an infrared camera to detect heat, the system then displays the image on a monitor in the dashboard. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer a night vision system.

Both the Q7 and the Range Rover Sport have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, all wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, around view monitors and rear cross-path warning.

For its top level performance in all IIHS frontal, side, rear impact and roof-crush tests, and its standard front crash prevention system, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the Q7 the rating of “Top Pick” for 2017, a rating granted to only 120 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The Range Rover Sport has not been tested, yet.

Warranty Comparison

The Q7’s corrosion warranty is 6 years longer than the Range Rover Sport’s (12 vs. 6 years).

There are over 72 percent more Audi dealers than there are Land Rover dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Q7’s warranty.

Reliability Comparison

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2017 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Audi vehicles are better in initial quality than Land Rover vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Audi 26th in initial quality. With 16 more problems per 100 vehicles, Land Rover is ranked 28th.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2016 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Audi vehicles are more reliable than Land Rover vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Audi 11th in reliability, above the industry average. With 64 more problems per 100 vehicles, Land Rover is ranked 29th.

Engine Comparison

As tested in Car and Driver the Q7 3.0T is faster than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport Supercharged 3.0 V6:



Range Rover Sport

Zero to 60 MPH

5.5 sec

5.9 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

14.5 sec

15.4 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

6.4 sec

6.5 sec

Passing 50 to 70 MPH

4.3 sec

4.4 sec

Quarter Mile

14.2 sec

14.5 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

99 MPH

97 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

On the EPA test cycle the Q7 gets better fuel mileage than the Range Rover Sport:




Range Rover Sport




19 city/25 hwy





19 city/25 hwy

17 city/23 hwy

3.0 Supercharged/Auto




17 city/22 hwy

5.0 Supercharged/Auto




15 city/20 hwy


To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Audi Q7 uses regular unleaded gasoline (premium recommended for maximum performance). The Range Rover Sport requires premium, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

For better stopping power the Q7’s standard brake rotors are larger than those on the Range Rover Sport:



Range Rover Sport

Front Rotors

14.8 inches

13.7 inches

Rear Rotors

13.8 inches

12.8 inches

The Q7 stops much shorter than the Range Rover Sport:



Range Rover Sport


70 to 0 MPH

166 feet

179 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

117 feet

125 feet

Motor Trend

Tires and Wheels Comparison

For better traction, the Q7 has larger standard tires than the Range Rover Sport (255/55R19 vs. 235/65R19). The Q7’s optional tires are larger than the largest tires available on the Range Rover Sport (285/45R20 vs. 275/40R22).

The Q7 2.0T’s standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Range Rover Sport’s standard 65 series tires.

Changing a flat tire near traffic can be dangerous and inconvenient. The run-flat tires available on the Q7 can be driven up to 50 miles without any air pressure, allowing you to drive to a service station for a repair. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer run-flat tires.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Q7’s wheelbase is 2.8 inches longer than on the Range Rover Sport (117.9 inches vs. 115.1 inches).

The Q7 Prestige handles at .85 G’s, while the Range Rover Sport HSE pulls only .78 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Q7 Premium Plus executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.2 seconds quicker than the Range Rover Sport HSE (26.4 seconds @ .68 average G’s vs. 27.6 seconds @ .62 average G’s).

Chassis Comparison

The design of the Audi Q7 amounts to more than styling. The Q7 has an aerodynamic coefficient of drag of .333 Cd (optional .32 Cd with Air Suspension). That is significantly lower than the Range Rover Sport (.37) and many sports cars. A more efficient exterior helps keep the interior quieter and helps the Q7 get better fuel mileage.

As tested by Car and Driver, the interior of the Q7 Prestige is quieter than the Range Rover Sport HSE:



Range Rover Sport

At idle

43 dB

45 dB


70 dB

79 dB

Cargo Capacity Comparison

The Q7’s cargo area provides more volume than the Range Rover Sport.



Range Rover Sport

Behind Third Seat

14.8 cubic feet

7.8 cubic feet

Third Seat Folded

37.5 cubic feet


Third Seat Removed


27.5 cubic feet

Second Seat Folded

71.6 cubic feet

59.5 cubic feet

The Q7’s cargo area is larger than the Range Rover Sport’s in almost every dimension:



Range Rover Sport

Length to seat (3rd/2nd/1st)



Max Width



Min Width






Ergonomics Comparison

To help drivers avoid possible obstacles, the Q7 offers optional cornering lights to illuminate around corners when the turn signals are activated. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer cornering lights. The Q7 also offers optional adaptive headlights to illuminate around corners automatically by reading vehicle speed and steering wheel angle.

To shield the driver and front passenger’s vision over a larger portion of the windshield and side windows, the Q7 has standard extendable sun visors. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer extendable visors.

Economic Advantages Comparison

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Q7 is less expensive to operate than the Range Rover Sport because it costs $178 less to do the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance for 50,000 miles. Typical repairs cost less on the Q7 than the Range Rover Sport, including $49 less for fuel injection.

Recommendations Comparison

Consumer Reports® chose the Audi Q7 as its “Top Pick,” the highest scoring vehicle in its category, based on reliability, safety and performance.

Car and Driver performed a comparison test in its March 2016 issue and they ranked the Audi Q7 Prestige first. They ranked the Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE third.

The Audi Q7 outsold the Land Rover Range Rover Sport by 64% during the 2017 model year.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.